Theodore of Mopsuestia – an exponential exegete of the Antiochian School in the golden age of Christianity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24193/ROOTS.2023.1.1Keywords:
Theodore, exegesis, Antioch, Christology, condemnationAbstract
This paper explores the life and work of Theodore of Mopsuestia, a key exponent of the Antiochene school of biblical interpretation. After providing biographical background situating Theodore as a student of Libanius and Diodore of Tarsus, the article outlines the history of the School of Antioch and Theodore's role as a teacher propagating principles of grammatical-historical exegesis. His prolific writings included commentaries on much of Scripture, though his interpretation emphasized the literal sense while downplaying typological readings. Doctrinally, Theodore combatted contemporary heresies but evidenced questionable Christology himself. He spoke of two subjects or persons in Christ and rejected the communication of attributes between Christ's divinity and humanity. Though initially orthodox, Theodore's theology anticipated Nestorian ideas, leading Cyril of Alexandria to critique his work. Ultimately the Fifth Ecumenical Council condemned Theodore posthumously. Modern scholarship has aimed to rehabilitate his legacy by distinguishing his use of terminology, assessing newly discovered writings, and analysing translation issues, yet his condemnation has not been overturned. Thus, this study presents a complex picture of this exegetical pioneer – a creative, ingenious interpreter who crossed boundaries into heterodoxy.
References
References
Anastos, Milton V. “The Immutability of Christ and Justinian's Condemnation of Theodore of Mopsuestia.” Dumbarton Oaks Papers 6 (1951): 123-60.
Apostolache, Ioniță. Hristologie și mistică în teologia siriană. Craiova: Mitropolia Olteniei. 2014.
Bar Brika, Ebede-Jesu. “Metrical Catalogue of Syriac Writers.” In George Percy Badger. The Nestorians and their rituals. Vol. 2. London: Joseph Masters, 1852.
Devreesse, Robert. “Essai sur Theodore de Mopsueste.” Studi e testi 141 (1948): 128-91.
Eusebius of Caesarea. “Church History.” In Părinți și Scriitori Bisericești. Vol. 13, Translated by Teodor Bodogae. Bucharest: EIBMO, 1987.
Hill, Robert C. “Introduction.” In Theodore of Mopsuestia, “Commentary on Psalms 1-81,” In Writingsfrom the Greco-Roman World. Vol. 5, Translated by Robert C. Hill. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature, 2006.
Leontius of Byzantium. “Adversus lncorupticolas et Nestor.” In PG. Vol. 86.
Louis-Sebastien Le Nain de Tillemont. Mémoires pour servir à l'histoire ecclésiastique des six premiers siècles and the Histoire des empereurs et autres princes qui ont régné pendant les six premiers siècles de l'Église. Vol. 12, Edited by Charles Robustel. Paris, 1707.
Mckenzie, John. “A Study of Theodore of Mopsuestia.” Theological Study 31 (1949): 394-408.
Paraschiv, Ion V. “Introducere.” In Theodore of Mopsuestia. Omilii catehetice. Translated by Ion V. Paraschiv. Cluj-Napoca: Renașterea, 2008.
Parvis, P. M. “The Commentary on Hebrew and the Contra Theodorum of Cyril of Alexandria.” The Journal of Theological Studies 2 (1975): 415-9.
Patterson, L. Theodore of Mopsuestia and Modern Thought. Eugene: Wipf&Stock, 2011.
Rees, Silas. “The 'De sectis': a Treatise attributed to Leontius of Byzantium.” The Journal of Theological Studies 40 (1939): 346-60.
St. John Chrysostom. “Ad Theodorum Lapsum II.” In PG. Vol. 27,209.
St. John Chrysostom. “Letters.” In Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers. Vol. 9. Edited by Philip Schaffcoll. Grand Rapids, 1898.
Stamatoiu, Dionisie. Noțiuni introductive de Studiul Noului Testament. Craiova: Universitaria, 1998.
Tyng, Dudley. “Theodore of Mopsuestia as an Interpreter of the Old Testament.” Journal of Biblical Literature 50 (1931): 298-303.
Vacant, A. and Mangenot, E. Dictionnaire de Théologie Catholique contenant l'expose des doctrines de la Théologie Catholique, leurs preuves et leur Histoire. Vol. 1A. Paris: Letouzey et Ané, 1909.
von Rooy, H.F. “Reading the Psalms historically. Antiochene Exegesis and a Historical Reading of Psalm 46.” Acta Theologica 2 (2009): 120-34.
