Yahweh – the Typology of the Relational Divine in the Theological Horizon of the Old Testament

Authors

  • Adrian Vasile Faculty of Orthodox Theology, Ovidius University of Constanta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24193/ROOTS.2024.1.3

Keywords:

Yahweh, Israel, Relation, Person, Anthropomorphism

Abstract

The Old Testament summarises not only a large segment of the history of humanity but also the configuration of the relationship between man and divinity. The religious phenomenology of the general spectrum of humanity reveals to us the fact that the experience of the sacred created the premises for a projection of this experience expressed under a cultic, doctrinal, and mystical aspect. Upon an objective survey of the religious field of humanity, where the differentiation criteria stand out as obvious, we can notice the fact that the Old Testament outlines a particular architecture of the relationship between Yahweh and man, namely based on God’s intention to enter a relational revelation with humanity, especially with the Jewish people. Our study explores this relational typology of the divine as it is highlighted throughout history and the theological developments in the Old Testament.

References

Byrne, M. “The Importance of Divine Designations in Old Testament Theology.” Irish Theological Quarterly 74.3: 334-49.

Cherbonnier, E. LaB. “The Logic of Biblical Anthropomorphism.” The Harvard Theological Review 55.3 (1962).

Clines, David. “Yahweh and the God Christian Theology.” Theology 83 (1980).

Cuțaru, Caius. “Desacralization and Resacralization in Mircea Eliade’s Vision.” Theologia 69.4 (2016).

de Vaux, R. “The Revelation of the Divine Name YHWH.” In Proclamation and Presence: Old Testament Essays in Honour of Gwynne Henton Davies. Edited by J.I. Durham and J.R. Porter. 1970.

Endean, Philip. “Christian Spirituality and the Theology of the Human Person.” In The Blackwell Companion to Christian Spirituality. Edited by Arthur Holder. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2005. Koterski, Joseph W. “Boethius and the Theological Origins of the Concept of Person.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 78.2 (2004): 203-224.

Gieschen, Charles A. Angelomorphic Christology: Antecedents and Early Evidence. Leiden/ Boston: Brill, 1998.

Howell, Brian C. In the Eyes of God: A Metaphorical Approach to Biblical Anthropomorphic Language. James Clarke & Company Limited, 2014.

Joas, Hans. „The Axial Age Debate as Religious Discourse.” In The Axial Age and Its Consequences. Edited by Robert N. Bellah and Hans Joas. Harward University Press, 2012.

Kaufmann, Yehezkel. The Religion of Israel, from Its Beginnings to the Babylonian Exile. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1960.

Lammert, Richard A. “The Word of YHWH as Theophany.” Concordia Theological Quarterly 73 (2009).

Lossky, Vladimir. In the Image and Likeness of God. New York: St Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 1974.

Muffs, Yochanan. Personhood of God: Biblical Theology, Human Faith and the Divine Image. Jewish Lights Publishing, 2009.

Pașca-Tușa, Stelian. “Numele lui Dumnezeu semn al prezenţei personale şi acţiunea sa mântuitoare (sotirică).” Studia Universitatis Babeş-Bolyai – Theologia Orthodoxa 1 (2010): 15-26.

Peet, Christopher. “Karl Jaspers and the Axial Age.” In Practicing Transcendence. Palgrave Macmillan, 2019.

Smith, Mark S. The Origins of Biblical Monotheism: Israel's Polytheistic Background and the Ugaritic Texts. Oxford: University Press, 2001.

Smith, Mark S. Where the Gods Are: Spatial Dimensions of Anthropomorphism in the Biblical World. Yale University Press, 2016.

Szerszynski, Bronislaw. Nature, Technology and the Sacred. Blacwell Publishing, 2005.

Walzer, Michael. Law, Politics, and Morality in Judaism. Princeton University Press, 2006.

Wittrock, Björn. “The Meaning of the Axial Age.” In Axial Civilizations and World History, Edited by Johann P. Arnason, Shmuel N. Eisenstadt, and Björn Wittrock. Brill, 2004.

Downloads

Published

2024-08-20

How to Cite

Vasile, A. (2024). Yahweh – the Typology of the Relational Divine in the Theological Horizon of the Old Testament. Napoca Roots, 11(1), 42–53. https://doi.org/10.24193/ROOTS.2024.1.3