The Importance of the Holy Scripture within the Canonical Tradition of the Orthodox Church
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24193/ROOTS.2023.1.4Cuvinte cheie:
Holy Scripture, Abrogation of Law, Law and grace, Orthodox Canon LawRezumat
This paper examines the views of Orthodox canonists on the relationship between the Holy Scripture and Canon Law in current academic research. It explores two general positions within Orthodox Canon Law: one that considers the Holy Scripture as a fundamental source of Canon Law, and another that postulates a conflict between the principles of love and grace found in Scripture and the legal aspects of Canon Law. The first position categorizes the Holy Scripture as divine written law, while the Holy Tradition is seen as divine unwritten law. The sources of law are further classified into fundamental, historical, and practical sources. The division of Canon Law also includes distinctions such as divine or natural Church Law, common law versus law, and old law versus new law. The text references various canonists and their works to support these classifications. It highlights the understanding of contemporary Orthodox canonists who continue to recognize the Holy Scripture as a source of divine written law, emphasizing the importance of formulating human laws by divine justice. In general, it is emphasized that all the canons of the Church included in the fundamental collection, being regarded as an essential part of the Patristic tradition and the synodal manifestation of the Church, can be understood as manifestations of the ecclesial experience across time and space, guided by the divine grace of the Holy Spirit, and as a continuation of biblical rules and norms.
Referințe
Adams, J. L. „Rudolph Sohm’s Theology of Law and the Spirit”, in Religion and Culture: Essays in Honor of Paul Tillich. Edited by W. Leibrecht. New York: Harper and Brothers, 1958.
Afanasieff, Nicolas. “Les canons et la conscience canonique”. Contacts 21 (1959): 112-27.
Afanasieff, Nicolas. „The Canons of the Church: Changeable or Unchangeable”. St. Vladimir’s Theological Quarterly 11(1967): 54-68.
Afanasieff, Nicolas. L’Église du Saint-Esprit. Paris: Les Éditions du Cerf, 1975.
Akanthopoulos, P. Θέματα κανονίκου δίκαιου. Thessaloniki, 1992.
Boumis, Panagiotis J. “The Canons of the Church Concerning the Canon of the Holy Scripture.” Theologia 67 (2007): 547-602.
Buisson, Ludwig. „Die Entstehung des Kirchenrechts”. Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte, Kanonistische Abteilung 52 (1966): 1-175.
Cattaneo, Arturo. Grundfragen des Kirchenrechts bei Klaus Mörsdorf: Synthese und Ansätze einer Wertung. John Benjamins Publishing, 1991.
Cholij, Roman. Clerical Celibacy in East and West. Gracewing Publishing, 1989.
Congar, Y. „Rudolf Sohm nous interroge encore.” Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques, 57 (1973): 263-94.
Constantinescu, Iulian Mihai. „Știința academică a Dreptului Canonic Ortodox. Contribuţiile canoniștilor Nicodim Milaș și Joseph Zhishman”. Mitropolia Olteniei 42.1-4 (2010): 97-99.
di Mauro, Dennis. A Love for Life: Christianity’s Consistent Protection of the Unborn. Wipf and Stock Publishers, 2008.
Dură, Ioan. „The Canons of the Sixth Ecumenical Synod Concerning Fasting and Their Application to the Present Needs of the Orthodox Faithful”. Greek Orthodox Theological Review 40.1-2 (1995): 149-64.
Erickson, John H. „The Council in Trullo: Issues Relating to the Marriage of Clergy”. Greek Orthodox Theological Review 40.1-2 (1995): 183-99.
Feldman, Louis H. Jew and Gentile in the Ancient World: Attitudes and Interactions from Alexander to Justinian. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996.
Floca, Ioan N. Drept canonic ortodox. Legislație și administrație bisericească, vol. I. București: Ed. Institutului Biblic și de Misiune al Bisericii Ortodoxe Române, 1990.
Gorman, Michael J. Abortion and the Early Church: Christian, Jewish and Pagan Attitudes in the Greco-Roman World. Wipf and Stock Publishers, 1998.
Haley, P. „Rudolph Sohm on Charisma”. The Journal of Religion 60.2 (1980): 185-97.
Joannou, Périclès-Pierre. Discipline génèrale antique (IIe-IXe s.). Index. Fonti, Série 1. Roma: Grottaferrata, 1963.
L'Huillier, Peter. The Church of the Ancient Councils: The Disciplinary Work of the First Four Ecumenical Councils. New York: St. Vladimir's Seminary Press, 1996.
Larin, Vassa. „What is «ritual im/purity» and why?.” St Vladimir’s Theological Quarterly 52.3-4 (2008): 275-92.
Milaș, Nicodim. Dreptul bisericesc oriental. Translated by D. Cornilescu și Vasile Radu. Bucharest: Gutenberg, 1915.
Milash, Nikodim. Das Kirchenrecht der morgenländischen Kirche. Pacher Kisic, 1905.
Milash, Nicodim. Pravoslavno crkveno pravo: po općim crkveno-pravnim izvorima i posebnim zakonskim naredbama, koje važe u pojedinim samoupravnim crkvama. Pečatnija Ivana Bodicke, Zara, 1890.
Mistry, Zubin. Abortion in the Early Middle Ages, C. 500-900. Centre for Medieval Studies University of York: York Medieval Press, 2015.
Moldovan, Valeriu. Curs elementar de drept bisericesc comparat. Cluj: Tipografia Naţională S.A., 1930.
Morris, Stephen. „Blood and Holy Communion: Late Antique Use of Luke 8:42-8”. Studia Patristica 44 (2010): 195-97.
Mörsdorf, Klaus. „Altkanonisches «Sakramentsrech: Eine Auseinandersetzung mit den Anschauungen Rudolph Sohms über die inneren Grundlagen des Decretum Gratiani”. Studia Gratiana 1 (1953): 483-502.
Mörsdorf, Klaus. „Wort und Sakrament als Bauelemente der Kirchenverfassung.” Archiv für katholisches Kirchenrecht 134 (1965): 72-9.
Papanikolaou, Aristotle; Prodromou Elizabeth H. Thinking Through Faith: New Perspectives from Orthodox Christian Scholars. New York: St Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 2008.
Patsavos, Lewis J. „Impediments of relationship in the sacrament of marriage.” Greek Orthodox Theological Review 56.1-4 (2011): 197-219.
Perșa, Răzvan „Intermarriage in the Canonical Tradition of the Orthodox Church.” Ecumenical Review Sibiu 10.3 (2018): 346-72.
Perșa, Răzvan. „The Image of Jews According to the Canonical Tradition of the Orthodox Church.” Religions 14:91 (2023): https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14010091
Perșa, Răzvan. Natura canoanelor și principiile de interpretare a lor în Dreptul canonic ortodox al secolelor XIX-XX. Cluj-Napoca: Presa Universitară Clujeană, 2021.
Perșa, Răzvan. Canoanele Bisericii Ortodoxe. Vol. 2. Canoanele Sinoadelor Locale. București: Basilica, 2022.
Petcu, Cristian-Vasile. „Current Issues Facing the Orthodox Family: Divorce and Mixed Marriages”. Analele Științifice ale Universității „Alexandru Ioan Cuza” din Iași. Teologie Ortodoxă 2 (2012): 105.
Pieler, P. „Das Alte Testament im Rechtsdenken der Byzantiner.” In Analecta Atheniensia ad ius Byzantinum spectantia I. Forschungen zur byzantinischen Rechtsgeschichte. Athener Reihe, 10. Edited by S. Troianos. Athena: Komotini, 1997.
Pocitan, Vasile. Compendiu de drept bisericesc al bisericei ortodoxe, comparativ cu bisericile Latină, Protestantă etc. și cu referinţe speciale la legile și regulamentele bisericei ortodoxe autocefale Române. Bucharest: Adolf I. Feldmann, 1898.
Popovici, Constantin. „Fontânele și Codicii dreptului bisericescu ortodoxu”. Candela. Jurnalu bisericescu-literaru 11 (1885): 661-8.
Popovici, Nicolae. Manual de drept bisericesc ortodox oriental cu privire speciala la dreptul particular al Bisericii Ortodoxe Române: (inclusiv noua lege pentru organizarea bisericeasca din anul 1925). Arad: Tiparul Tipografiei Diecezane Ortodoxe Române, 1925.
Rodopoulos, Panteleimon. An Overview of Orthodox Canon Law. Rollinsford: Orthodox Research Institute, 2007.
Rodopoulos, Panteleinon. „Sacred Canons and Laws.” Kanon 10 (1991): 9-10.
Roman, Emilian-Iustinian. „Canonical and Theological Perspectives on Abortion and Incest”. Analele Științifice ale Universității «Alexandru Ioan Cuza» din Iași. Teologie Ortodoxă 2 (2009): 125-38.
Șesan, Valerian. Curs de drept bisericesc universal. Edited by Dr. Dr. Milan Șesan. Cernăuţi, 1942.
Sohm, Rudolph. Kirchenrecht, I. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot, 1892.
Stan, Lavinia. „Eastern orthodox views on sexuality and the body.” Women’s Studies International Forum 33.1 (2010): 38-46.
Stan, Liviu. „Das Wesen des orthodoxen Kirchenrechts – göttliche Setzung oder geschichtlich wandelbar.” Kyros 8 (1968): 180-9.
Stan, Liviu. „Jus ecclesiasticum. Dreptul în viața Bisericii”, Studii Teologice, sn, 12.7-8 (1960): 467-83, reluat în: Liviu Stan, „Jus ecclesiasticum. Dreptul în viața Bisericii”, în: Liviu Stan, Biserica și dreptul. Teologia Dreptului, vol. 1, 34-64.
Stan, Liviu. „Obârșia și dezvoltarea istorică a Dreptului bisericesc.” Mitropolia Olteniei 20.1-2 (1968): 3-11.
Stan, Liviu. Biserica și dreptul. Fragmente de curs. Vol. 8. Sibiu: Andreiana, 2017.
Stan, Liviu. Mirenii în Biserică. Sibiu: Editura Arhidiecezană, 1939.
Stan, Liviu. Ontologia Juris. Coll. Seria Teologică, 13. Sibiu: Tipografia Arhidiecezană, 1943.
The Rudder (Pedalion) of the Metaphorical Ship of the One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church of Orthodox Christians. Chicago, 1957.
Viscuso, Patrick. „Late Byzantine canonical views on the dissolution of marriage.” Greek Orthodox Theological Review 44.1-4 (1999): 273-90.
Wagschal 2015a: Wagschal, David. Law and Legality in the Greek East: The Byzantine Canonical Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.
Wagschal 2015b: Wagschal, David. „The Orthodox Tradition [Early Modern Period]”. In The Oxford Encyclopedia of the Bible and Law, 245-253. Edited by Brent Strawn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.
Wijlens, Mirjam. Theology and Canon Law: The Theories of Klaus Mörsdorf and Eugenio Corecco. Ottawa: Saint Paul University, 1990.
Wortley, John. „The sixtieth canon of the Council in Troullo.” Studia patristica 15.1 (1984): 255-60.
Ακανθοπούλου, Προδρόμου. „Ιεροί Κανόνες και μετάφραση της Αγίας Γραφής”, in: Η μετάφραση της Αγίας Γραφής στην Ορθόδοξη Εκκλησία: εισηγήσεις Δ' συνάξεως ορθοδόξων Βιβλικών θεολόγων, Θεσσαλονίκη 25-28 Οκτωβρίου 1986. Θεσσαλονίκη: Σύναξη Ορθοδόξων Βιβλικών Θεολόγων, 1986.
Χριστοδούλου, Αρχιμανδρίτης Απόστολος. Δοκίμιον Ἐκκλησιαστικοῦ Δικαίου. Ἐν Κωνσταντινουπόλει: Ἐκ τοῦ Πατριαρχικοῦ Τυπογραφείου, 1896.
